Build Sustinable
Truth about Sustainable Building Materials for Bali
A Guide (2025)
Truth about Sustainable Building Materials for Bali
A Guide (2025)
Sustainability in Bali is not a design aesthetic. It's survival.
A sustainable built home is only one part of the equation. It relies entirely on the ecosystem dimension you are part of—ideally natural pools, permaculture-first principle, forest-first environments, living-water priority, and above all, community-first living. In this dimension, the very idea, for example, of using chemical fogging becomes unthinkable.
This article focuses on materials—the tangible decisions that determine whether your building becomes part of the solution or part of the problem. But remember: even the most sustainable materials fail without the ecosystem they sit in.
The island's relentless 32–35°C heat, 80–95% humidity, subterranean termites, monsoon deluges, and regular seismic tremors destroy imported "eco-friendly" materials in under five years. What works in Scandinavia, California, or even Java often becomes expensive compost here.
This isn't theory—it's thermodynamics, entomology, and supply-chain physics.
When building in Bali, sustainability collapses into two brutal metrics:
1. Embedded Energy
How much pollution was created to make and transport this material? That Italian marble might be gorgeous, but it arrived on a container ship burning bunker fuel—emitting more CO₂ than your entire building will save in a decade.
2. Bioclimatic Fit
Can your building stay at 26–28°C indoors without running AC 24/7? A concrete-batako villa in Canggu can hit 38°C indoors by 2 PM, forcing AC bills of 3–5 million rupiah monthly. A well-designed bamboo structure with proper ventilation? 26°C naturally, zero electricity. If your walls turn your bedroom into an oven, you've failed—regardless of how "green" the brochure claimed it was.
Projects like Green School and Green Village (built almost entirely from treated bamboo by IBUKU since 2007) prove that tropical architecture can be luxurious, seismically safe, and near-zero-carbon when you respect these principles.
Bamboo grows 20–90 cm per day, sequesters more CO₂ than any tree, has tensile strength exceeding steel, and bends instead of breaking during earthquakes. It's the closest thing Bali has to "native structural steel."
The catch? Treatment is everything. Untreated or poorly treated bamboo becomes powder within 18–36 months thanks to powder-post beetles.
Critical requirement: Demand immersion treatment with borax + boron solution (non-toxic). Insist on Bamboo U or IBUKU-level protocols. When done right, bamboo structures last 30–50+ years.
Species to use: Giant bamboo varieties like Petung (Dendrocalamus asper), Tali, or Hitam.
Black Lava Stone / Andesite
Mold-resistant, zero maintenance, naturally breathable, ages like fine wine. Creates a thermal "skin" that regulates interior humidity.
River Stone
Perfect for foundations—eliminates 70–90% of concrete needs. Just ensure ethical sourcing that doesn't disrupt sawah(rice field) irrigation systems.
Ancient Coral Stone
Quarried from raised fossil reefs in Bukit and Nusa Penida (not live coral). Extraordinarily durable with natural insulation properties.
Non-negotiable: Verify stones come from legal quarries with proper environmental permits.
Why cob outperforms rammed earth in Bali:
Cob uses minimal or zero cement—typically just clay, sand, straw, and water mixed on-site. The Bukit peninsula and northern Bali have near-perfect limestone-clay soils for cob construction.
The thermodynamic reality in Bali's tropics:
Unlike temperate climates where thermal mass works by absorbing daytime heat and releasing it at night, Bali's cob walls function differently. The earth acts as a perpetual heat sink—the constant contact with the ground allows heat to continuously dissipate downward into the cooler earth mass below, rather than cycling back into the interior at night.
Build walls 400–600mm thick and the result: bedrooms stay at 24–27°C without AC, even during peak heat.
Embodied carbon? Near-zero when produced on-site with minimal cement.
Critical distinction from rammed earth:
Rammed earth typically uses 5–8% cement as a stabilizer. While this is lower concentration than batako's ~10% cement content, the math reveals a problem:
A 5m × 3m batako wall (90mm thick) = 1.35 m³ volume
The same 5m × 3m rammed earth wall (500mm thick) = 7.5 m³ volume
That's 5.5 times more material
Result: A rammed earth house can use 2.75 times more total cement than a batako house despite lower cement percentage.
Cob avoids this entirely by using little to no cement, relying instead on proper curing, wall thickness, and clay-straw binding for structural integrity.
Reclaimed Ulin is practically immortal—old wharf piles routinely last 80–100 years submerged in salt water. It's naturally termite-resistant and harder than most tropical hardwoods.
The golden rule: Only use reclaimed wood. Freshly cut Ulin or Merbau drives deforestation in Kalimantan and Sumatra.
The emerging star: Coconut timber from senile palms (70+ years old). Surprisingly hard, Class I durability, naturally termite-resistant, abundant, and beautiful dark grain. Using it prevents burning of old palms and creates zero new deforestation.
A 300–400mm thick alang-alang (Imperata cylindrica) roof keeps attic temperatures 8–12°C cooler than metal or tile. The grass weave allows hot air to escape naturally—something synthetic materials cannot replicate.
Lifespan: 7–12 years with proper pitch (minimum 45°), generous overhangs, and occasional grooming.
End of life: Becomes garden mulch. Zero landfill.
Note: Synthetic thatch cannot compete thermodynamically or ecologically—it traps heat, sheds microplastics, and off-gasses VOCs.
Produced in thousands of small kilns across Java and Bali using rice-husk or coconut-shell fuel—drastically lower emissions than industrial cement production.
Why it works: Porous structure breathes and regulates humidity naturally. Pair with lime plaster (not cement render) for maximum breathability. Cheap, durable, and looks better with age.
Coconut Wood & Husk Panels – Zero-waste, abundant, beautiful grain
AAC Blocks with Volcanic Ash Mix – If concrete is unavoidable, these are the only acceptable alternative
Hempcrete or Mycelium Panels – Carbon-negative, astonishing insulation (already used in several Ubud/Bukit projects)
Recycled Ocean Plastic Bricks – Good for non-structural walls when local earth isn't suitable
Why people use it: Cheap, available everywhere, familiar to local builders.
Why it fails: Cement production accounts for 8% of global CO₂ emissions. Hollow concrete blocks (batako) have almost zero insulation—your building becomes an oven, forcing permanent AC dependency.
The result: High operational carbon for decades.
Use instead: Cob for walls, AAC blocks with volcanic ash mix if concrete is unavoidable, river stone for foundations.
Acceptable use: Foundations below damp-proof course only.
Why people use it: Cheap availability, beautiful hardwood aesthetics.
Why it fails: Cheap "new" Merbau, Bangkirai, or Teak flooding the market in 2025 is still directly linked to illegal Kalimantan deforestation.
Always demand: SVLK + FLEGT certification. No paperwork? Walk away.
Use instead: Reclaimed timber or coconut wood.
Why people use it: Modern aesthetics, views, Instagram appeal.
Why it fails: The fastest way to make a building uninhabitable without 24/7 air conditioning. Even with double Low-E glass, solar heat gain in the tropics is catastrophic. Glass facades act as greenhouses, trapping massive amounts of heat and creating energy slaves.
If glass is non-negotiable: Use only on north/east façades with 2m+ overhangs and external shading systems.
Why people use it: Dirt cheap, lightweight, widely available.
Why it fails: Still legally sold in Indonesia as of 2025. Carcinogenic, friable, impossible to dispose of safely.
There is zero excuse for using this material.
Why people use it: Lasts 20 years, no maintenance, fire-resistant.
Why it fails: Sheds microplastics into waterways, traps heat (zero ventilation), and off-gasses volatile organic compounds. Defeats the entire purpose of tropical passive cooling design.
Why people use it: Cheap insulation, easy to install.
Why it fails: Blocks breathability, becomes termite buffet when exposed, and pollutes waterways when fragments blow away during construction. Bali's open construction sites routinely send foam particles into rice fields and rivers.
Why people use it: Beautiful for carvings, traditional aesthetics, easy to carve.
Why it's problematic: Large-scale structural use is environmentally disastrous. Quarries in Mengwi and Tabanan have left moonscapes and caused deadly landslides.
Acceptable use: Sparingly and only from licensed, rehabilitated quarries. Beautiful for temple carvings and decorative cladding, but not for large-scale structural use.
Here's the uncomfortable truth: You see $500,000 bamboo villas become moldy disasters within 18 months. Not because bamboo failed—because the design ignored these non-negotiables:
Nothing untreated lasts. Period. Bali's subterranean termites destroy softwoods and untreated bamboo in under three years. Only treated bamboo, Ulin, coconut timber, and stone provide stable foundations.
A "sustainable" material in a sealed box still molds. Cross-ventilation + elevated floors + high ceilings are mandatory in Bali's humidity.
1.5–2.5m eaves reduce solar gain by 70%. Deep overhangs are not decorative—they're load-bearing climate control.
Prioritize in this order:
Roof insulation > wall thermal mass > shading > ventilation > (only then) fans/AC
Light, flexible, redundant systems (bamboo, timber frames, light cladding) survive earthquakes. Brittle heavy masonry does not.
Bali has no industrial recycling infrastructure. Choose materials that rot cleanly, burn safely, or can be reused indefinitely without processing.
Green School / Green Village (IBUKU) – 100% bamboo campus, zero AC in classrooms, operating since 2007
Eco Village Sibang & Ubud – Built with cob, reclaimed wood, bamboo, and alang-alang; many open villas showcasing natural materials and tropical design
The Slow Canggu – Rammed earth + reclaimed timber + alang-alang
Bawa House (Stilt Studios) – Prefab coconut wood + elevated design
These aren't experimental prototypes. They're lived-in proof that sustainable tropical architecture performs better than conventional concrete boxes.
"Sustainable building costs more" is the industry's favorite myth.
Reality: A properly designed bamboo or cob house costs 15–30% less per year to operate than a concrete-glass box. Factor in 15-year operating costs (AC bills, maintenance, replacements) and sustainability becomes the financially sensible choice.
The wrong materials turn your dream home into a hot, moldy, money-burning liability that loses value.
The right ones create an heirloom that improves the island and appreciates over decades.
Sustainable construction in Bali isn't just about the materials.
Materials are one critical piece—but remember: a bamboo house with a chlorinated pool, no forest layers, and zero community integration is just a beautiful box that misses the ecosystem point.
The Materials Foundation:
Low embedded energy materials
Passive cooling architecture
Breathable, humidity-regulating materials
Ecological alignment with tropical conditions
Respect for seismic reality
Plus The Ecosystem Integration:
Natural pools and water systems
Permaculture-first principle
Forest-first environments
Community integration and mutual support
Buildings and land that honor these principles perform better, last longer, cost less to operate, and actively protect Bali's fragile ecosystems.
Buildings that ignore them become expensive problems within five years.
The materials are where you start. The ecosystem is where you finish.
For authentic cob and natural building expertise in Bali, contact Kurt Beckman, who specializes in sustainable cob construction using Bali's ideal limestone-clay soils, with a focus on natural cooling and dehumidifying—creating homes that breathe with the climate rather than fight against it.
WhatsApp: +62 813-3898-0291
Feel the Water
Airconditioner
Trust the Nymph
Smell the Soil
Green Village Bali & IBUKU – Bamboo architecture portfolio (2007–2025)
Bamboo U – Treatment protocols and construction training
Pablo Luna Studio – Alang-alang technical specifications
Bali Best Build – Local materials review 2025
IBUKU / Green School case studies – Long-term performance data
Kurt Beckman field data – Cob thermal performance and alang-alang cooling effects in Bali's tropical context
Last updated: November 2025
Roofing Comparison: Tebu (Sugar Cane Thatch) vs Sirap (Ulin Shingles)
The graph below shows continuous temperature monitoring under two different natural roofing materials in identical conditions:
Blue line (TEBU): Sugar cane thatch (similar performance to alang-alang)
Red line (SIRAP): Ulin wood shingles
Natural grass thatch (tebu/alang-alang) maintains approximately 4°C cooler interior temperatures compared to Ulin wood shingles throughout the daily cycle.
The critical insight: The area under the red curve above the blue curve represents energy introduced into the building.
Sirap (wood shingles): Shows significant daily temperature spikes, indicating substantial radiant energy conversion—sunlight being converted into heat energy that enters the building
Alang-alang (grass thatch): Temperature profile simply follows ambient air temperature fluctuation with negligible energy build-up
Alang-alang adds almost no thermal load to the building. The roof doesn't become a heat source.
In contrast, materials like:
Clay tiles
Metal roofing
Asphalt shingles
Even Sirap (Ulin shingles)
...all introduce significant energy through radiant heat conversion, forcing air conditioning to work harder to remove that energy.
Alang-alang's superior performance comes from:
Thickness (300-400mm): Creates deep insulation barrier
Air gaps in the weave: Hot air escapes vertically through the grass structure
Low thermal mass: Material doesn't store heat to release later
High albedo: Light-colored surface reflects rather than absorbs solar radiation
Breathability: Allows convective cooling rather than trapping heat
Result: The roof essentially becomes thermally neutral—it tracks ambient temperature rather than amplifying it.
Based on field data and thermal performance:
Alang-alang (natural thatch) – Negligible energy introduction, ~4°C cooler than wood
Sirap (Ulin shingles) – Better than industrial materials but still introduces significant radiant energy
Clay tiles – High thermal mass, stores and radiates heat
Metal roofing – Catastrophic in tropics; becomes radiator
Asphalt shingles – Worst option; maximum heat absorption and retention
If your roof introduces significant radiant energy (anything below alang-alang on the hierarchy), your AC is fighting the roof all day.
A poorly insulated roof can add 2-4 tons of cooling load to a typical villa, translating to:
2-3 million rupiah/month additional electricity costs
Oversized AC units required
Shortened equipment lifespan from overwork
Decades of operational carbon emissions
Alang-alang eliminates this thermal penalty entirely.
Despite being outperformed by alang-alang, Sirap (Ulin shingles) remains valuable because:
Durability: 40-80 year lifespan vs 7-12 years for thatch
Fire resistance: Important in certain locations
Heritage aesthetics: Traditional Balinese architecture
Still superior to industrial materials: The 4°C penalty compared to alang-alang is vastly better than the 8-12°C penalty of metal or tile
For buildings where re-thatching every 7-10 years isn't practical, properly ventilated Sirap with generous overhangs remains an excellent choice.
Temperature data collected using matched sensors placed in identical ceiling positions under each roof type. Measurements taken continuously over multiple daily cycles to eliminate anomalies. Both structures oriented identically, same altitude, same microclimate exposure.
Data source: Kurt Beckman field research, Eco Village Sibang & Ubud, 2020-2025
This graph compares continuous temperature monitoring over 5 days (February 24-28, 2023) between a cob house (Villa 12, Eco Village) and a conventional batako house near Green School with mature shade trees.
Legend:
Blue: Ambient outdoor temperature (measured in shade)
Red: Inside batako house temperature
Yellow/Green: Inside cob house temperature (two overlaid datasets)
Each peak-to-peak sinusoidal segment represents one 24-hour cycle.
The batako house indoor temperature follows the midline average of the day/night ambient fluctuation with dampening of the highs and lows.
What happened on day 3: The sensor was moved from an east-facing bedroom to a west-facing bedroom. The temperature profile immediately changed to show more aggressive afternoon heat gain as the western sun cast directly on that side of the house.
Interpretation: This is classic thermal mass behavior in temperate climates—the walls absorb and release heat in a delayed cycle, averaging out the daily temperature swing but ultimately tracking ambient conditions.
The cob house internal temperature stays up to 4°C cooler than the average ambient temperature.
The remarkable flatness of the curve illustrates the thermal mass's resistance to ambient temperature changes. It does not want to budge.
Here's what should have happened but didn't:
If cob were behaving like standard thermal mass (as in temperate climates), it ought to follow the same general pattern as the batako house—tracking the daily midline average but with even further dampening of highs and lows due to thicker walls.
What actually happened:
The cob curve is indexed 4°C lower than ambient consistently. It's not just dampening the temperature swings—it's operating at a fundamentally cooler baseline.
This is only possible through continuous thermal linking to the earth as a heat sink.
Unlike temperate climates where thermal mass cycles heat storage (absorb during day, release at night), Bali's cob walls in continuous ground contact allow heat to dissipate downward into the cooler earth mass indefinitely.
The earth below remains at a relatively constant temperature year-round (typically 22-24°C in Bali's highlands). The thick cob walls act as a thermal bridge, continuously wicking heat away from the interior air and conducting it into the ground.
Result: The house maintains a temperature below ambient air temperature—passive cooling with no moving parts, no energy input, no software, no maintenance.
Cob's earth-sink cooling works best as part of an integrated system. The field data from Eco Village demonstrates four synergistic factors:
Protects the forest floor ecosystem and maintains high soil moisture levels. Healthy plants transpire—converting liquid water to water vapor through evaporation.
Evaporation requires energy absorption to make the phase transition, and it takes that energy from surrounding air. This is nature's powerful cooling mechanism for the forest, effectively lowering ambient air temperature around the building by 2-4°C compared to cleared land.
Alang-alang or tebu thatch (300-400mm thick) stops solar heat build-up in the house and prevents radiant energy from reaching the roof. Wide overhangs (1.5-2.5m) shade the cob thermal mass from direct solar heating.
Critical: If the cob walls are exposed to direct sun, they will heat up and lose their cooling capacity. Shading is non-negotiable.
Rapid air exchange keeps the house cool and prevents mold establishment. Cross-ventilation allows the cob-cooled air to circulate throughout the space while exhausting warmer air through high vents or roof peaks.
Welcome gentle morning sun but especially shield the house from intense western afternoon sun. Western exposure introduces the most aggressive thermal load during the hottest part of the day.
Cob House:
Baseline temperature: 4°C below ambient average
Daily temperature swing: ±1°C
Peak afternoon temperature: ~27°C
Thermal stability: Highly stable
AC requirement: Zero (naturally comfortable)
Western sun vulnerability: Minimal (with proper shading)
Batako House:
Baseline temperature: Tracks ambient average
Daily temperature swing: ±3-4°C
Peak afternoon temperature: ~30-31°C
Thermal stability: Moderate dampening
AC requirement: High (exceeds comfort threshold)
Western sun vulnerability: Severe (direct thermal gain)
Cob house (yellow/green curves):
Maintains 25-27°C consistently
Remains within human comfort zone (22-28°C) without mechanical cooling
Zero operational energy for cooling
Zero operational carbon emissions
Batako house (red curve):
Fluctuates 27-31°C
Regularly exceeds comfort threshold (28°C+)
Requires AC to bring temperature down during afternoon peaks
Monthly cooling costs: 2-4 million rupiah
Decades of operational carbon emissions
Over 20 years:
Batako house cooling costs: 480-960 million rupiah (~$30,000-60,000 USD)
Cob house cooling costs: 0 rupiah
This is proof-of-concept for earth-coupled passive cooling in tropical conditions—a thermodynamic principle that's widely misunderstood or ignored in conventional tropical architecture.
Most architects and builders in Bali still design thermal mass using temperate-climate assumptions (heat storage and delayed release). This field data demonstrates that when properly executed with ground contact, forest canopy, insulative roofing, and strategic shading, cob construction achieves sub-ambient cooling indefinitely.
This isn't theoretical. It's measured, repeatable, and economically transformative.
Cob house measurements (Villa 12, Eco Village Sibang):
500mm thick cob walls (clay, sand, straw, minimal cement)
Continuous ground contact (no raised foundation)
400mm alang-alang roof with 2m overhangs
Dense forest canopy coverage
East-facing primary orientation
Batako house measurements (near Green School):
90mm hollow concrete block walls with plaster
Raised foundation (no earth coupling)
Metal roof
Mature shade trees
Mixed orientation (sensor moved from east to west bedroom)
Data collection: Continuous temperature monitoring using calibrated sensors, February 24-28, 2023. Outdoor sensor placed in permanent shade to measure true ambient air temperature.
Data source: Kurt Beckman field research, Eco Village Sibang, 2023